GPUs: On-Premise vs. Public Cloud
-
Compares cloud vs. on-prem GPU deployments over a 3-year horizon using real-world data
-
Calculates detailed Total Cost of Ownership
-
Equips you to make strategic infrastructure decisions with full visibility into long-term financial and operational impacts

Optimizing GPU Investments: A Strategic Imperative
For IT executives, the decision of where to deploy high-performance GPU infrastructure is a pivotal strategic choice. It directly impacts operational efficiency, application performance, data governance, and an organization’s capacity for innovation. In today’s landscape, driven by AI, machine learning, and advanced analytics, a clear understanding of the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and functional alignment over a 3-year lifecycle is essential.
At Li9, we offer a rigorous, “apples-to-apples” comparison designed specifically for executive decision-makers. We provide clarity on the complexities of GPU deployments, delivering actionable insights into the long-term value of on-premise solutions versus leading public cloud providers.
Our Core Comparison: IBM Fusion HCI with Satellite vs. Public Cloud GPUs
Our analysis focuses on a direct comparison between two primary deployment models for high-performance GPU workloads:
- On-Premise IBM Storage Fusion HCI with IBM Cloud Satellite Management: This model represents a modern approach to private infrastructure, where GPU servers are integrated into an active IBM Storage Fusion HCI environment. IBM Cloud Satellite Services are leveraged to provide a cloud-managed experience, aiming for operational effort comparable to public cloud, while retaining the benefits of on-premises control.
- Public Cloud GPU Servers (AWS and Azure): We conduct a detailed examination of GPU instance offerings from Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure. Our assessment prioritizes long-term commitment pricing models (e.g., Reserved Instances, Savings Plans) to reflect cost-efficient strategies for sustained enterprise workloads.
This focused comparison highlights the core differences in cost, functionality, and operational models, providing a clear basis for executive decisions.
Key Dimensions of Our Comprehensive Comparison:
Our methodology provides a holistic view, addressing the critical factors that influence your GPU infrastructure strategy:
1. Total Cost of Ownership Over 3 Years
Beyond initial expenditures, we uncover the full financial commitment:
Hardware Acquisition (On-Premise): Initial capital outlay for GPU servers, including GPUs, CPUs, memory, storage, and networking components within the Fusion HCI environment.
Cloud Instance Costs (AWS & Azure): Detailed analysis of compute, GPU, storage, and networking charges under 3-year committed use discounts.
Operational Expenses
- Power & Cooling: Energy consumption and HVAC costs for on-premise deployments.
- Maintenance & Support: Hardware maintenance, software licensing, and ongoing support for both models.
- IT Staffing: The allocation of internal IT resources for management, monitoring, and troubleshooting, highlighting how IBM Cloud Satellite can streamline these efforts for Fusion HCI.
- Data Transfer Costs: Evaluating potential egress charges in public cloud environments.
2. Application Functionality & Performance
The right infrastructure must empower your applications, not constrain them:
- Workload Suitability: Assessing which types of applications (e.g., AI/ML training, inference, data analytics, high-performance computing, rendering) are best suited for each environment based on their specific demands for GPU acceleration, CPU processing, and I/O.
- Performance Benchmarking: Analyzing expected throughput, latency, and scalability to ensure your chosen platform delivers the required computational power for your most demanding workloads.
- GPU Shared Infrastructure (IBM Fusion HCI): Fusion HCI enables efficient GPU utilization through virtualization and multi-tenancy. This allows multiple workloads or tenants to efficiently share physical GPU resources, maximizing hardware investment and optimizing resource allocation. This capability can lead to significant cost efficiencies by reducing the need for dedicated GPU resources per project.
3. Data Locality, Security & Compliance
Critical considerations for regulated industries and data-intensive operations:
- Data Residency: The ability to keep sensitive data on-premises to meet strict regulatory and compliance requirements, a key advantage of Fusion HCI.
- Latency: The impact of data proximity on application performance, particularly for real-time AI/ML inference or edge computing scenarios where data must be processed close to its source.
- Security Posture: A comparative look at the security models, compliance certifications, and data protection capabilities offered by each platform, including how IBM Cloud Satellite extends consistent security controls to on-premises environments.
4. Operational Effort & Agility
Evaluating the human and process costs of managing your infrastructure:
- Unified Management (IBM Cloud Satellite): How Satellite provides a single control plane for managing on-premises Red Hat OpenShift clusters on Fusion HCI, streamlining operations, automating tasks, and reducing the need for specialized in-house expertise. This shifts the focus from infrastructure “ops” to application “innovation.”
- Automation & Orchestration: The level of automation available for provisioning, scaling, and maintaining GPU resources in both cloud and on-premise environments.
- Flexibility & Scalability: The ease and cost-effectiveness of scaling GPU resources up or down to meet fluctuating demands, and the agility to adapt to new business requirements.
Why Choose Li9 for Your GPU Infrastructure Strategy?
As IT executives, you need more than just data; you need clarity and confidence. Li9 provides comprehensive analysis and strategic guidance:
- Unbiased, Data-Driven Analysis: Our comparisons are rooted in meticulous research and real-world cost models, providing an objective foundation for your decisions.
- Executive-Level Insights: We translate complex technical and financial data into concise, strategic recommendations that align with your business objectives.
- Holistic TCO Perspective: We ensure all relevant costs—direct, indirect, and operational—are factored into your long-term planning.
- Actionable Recommendations: Our reports don’t just present findings; they provide a clear roadmap for optimizing your GPU investments for performance, cost, and compliance.
Ready to Make an Informed Decision?
Don’t let the complexities of GPU infrastructure hinder your innovation. Contact Li9 today for a personalized consultation and discover how our expert analysis can empower your organization to achieve optimal performance and cost efficiency for your high-performance computing workloads.